So where did this all come from? Mostly from a familiar recipe. They have been spotted at the same events more than once, fashion weeks, private dinners, mutual friends, and the kind of low key “they arrived separately but left around the same time” sightings that fuel entire Reddit threads. Add to that Kim’s recent shift into a more discreet, almost strategic dating era, and Lewis’s long standing preference for privacy, and suddenly the absence of evidence becomes the evidence. Neither has confirmed anything, which in celebrity culture is basically a soft launch with plausible deniability.

What makes this pairing especially fascinating is not just the fame math, but the contrast. Kim Kardashian is the ultimate pop culture shapeshifter, someone who absorbs the energy of whoever she dates and subtly recalibrates her brand around it. Lewis Hamilton, on the other hand, is a global sports icon who has been steadily redefining masculinity, activism, and lifestyle choices in public. If they are dating, it feels less like a fling and more like a convergence of power, influence, and very different worldviews.

Which brings us to the question everyone is quietly asking with a smile. Can Lewis Hamilton turn Kim Kardashian vegan?

Lewis has been outspoken about his vegan lifestyle for years, tying it to performance, ethics, and environmental responsibility. It is not a trend for him, it is a value system. Kim, meanwhile, has flirted with plant based eating before, particularly in relation to health and beauty, but has never fully committed as she still exploits animals for exotic skin handbags, leather clothes and so on. That said, she is famously receptive to lifestyle shifts when they align with wellness, longevity, or cultural relevance. Veganism ticks all three boxes right now.

If history tells us anything, Kim does not change overnight, she curates transitions. So no, do not expect a sudden tofu themed Instagram grid. But could we see more plant based skincare partnerships, cruelty free fashion choices, and casual mentions of vegan meals in interviews? Absolutely. Lewis does not need to convert her in a preachy way. His influence works through example, discipline, and a kind of quiet conviction that makes people curious rather than defensive.

Whether or not this romance is real, the rumour itself says something interesting about where celebrity culture is headed. Power couples are no longer just about glamour, they are about values, optics, and the stories we project onto them. Kim and Lewis together represent a merging of pop dominance and purposeful living. And if that ends with Kim Kardashian ordering a vegan pizza on a reality show someday, the internet will absolutely lose its mind.

The post Are Kim Kardashian and Lewis Hamilton dating? Can he turn her vegan? appeared first on KIMU.

There’s no ignoring it: All’s Fair has been absolutely pummelled by critics. With a rare 0 % to 5 % score on Rotten Tomatoes, it’s been branded everything from “possibly the worst television drama ever made” to “a crime against television.” Reviewers have slammed everything – from the script to Kim Kardashian’s “stiff and affectless” performance – calling the dialogue “a tsunami of clunking cliché.”

But hear me out. Despite (or even because of) its flaws, All’s Fair is kind of… amazing. It’s bold, empowering, stylish, and unapologetically over the top. If you stop judging it as prestige TV and see it for what it really is – a high-glam telenovela with powerhouse women, lightning-fast pacing, and Sarah Paulson delivering the sassiest one-liners on television – it suddenly clicks. Here’s why the critics are wrong, and All’s Fair might just be the most entertaining mess on TV.

Empowerment at Its Core

On paper, All’s Fair is about an all-female divorce law firm in L.A., led by Kim Kardashian as Allura Grant. That already screams empowerment: women taking charge in a male-dominated world, flipping the script on power, love, and leverage. Sure, critics call it hollow – but the concept itself is bold. These women aren’t waiting for permission; they’re owning boardrooms, courtrooms, and designer wardrobes. It’s glossy, yes, but that sheen hides a fierce undercurrent of ambition, rivalry, and identity.

And sometimes? That’s exactly what empowerment looks like – messy, glamorous, and unapologetically loud.

The Telenovela Vibes We Secretly Crave

Here’s the thing: All’s Fair isn’t trying to be Suits. It’s Dynasty meets The Bold Type meets Big Little Lies on caffeine. Affairs, betrayals, high-stakes divorces, glass offices, stilettos clicking down marble halls – it’s full-blown telenovela energy.

Critics call it “cotton-candy TV: sticky, airy, and, once it’s gone, both satisfying and nausea-inducing.” But that’s not an insult – that’s a mood. It’s camp done right. The show knows what it is: a guilty-pleasure fever dream that doesn’t apologize for its drama.

The Epic Cast & Sarah Paulson’s Iconic One-Liners

Let’s talk cast: Naomi Watts. Glenn Close. Niecy Nash-Betts. Teyana Taylor. And of course, Sarah Paulson – who’s clearly having the time of her life. Even when the dialogue wobbles, these women anchor it with pure charisma.

Sarah’s razor-sharp delivery has turned her one-liners into instant fan favorites – the kind you pause and replay just to savor. Whether she’s dropping legal burns or emotional grenades, she owns the screen. And that’s the secret: the cast sells the fantasy.

Fashion, Guest Stars & Fast-Paced Fun

If you love TV that looks like money, All’s Fair is a visual feast. The fashion is next-level – power suits, luxury fabrics, bold color blocking, and courtroom couture. It’s practically a runway show disguised as legal drama.

And those guest appearances? Wild. Cameos from A-listers, influencers, and unexpected stars keep it unpredictable – a mix of old Hollywood meets new-age celebrity chaos. These include Jessica Simpson, Elizabeth Berkley, Eddie Cibrian, Hari Nef and more.

The pacing is relentless, too – cases, scandals, and cliffhangers fly by so fast you barely have time to breathe. It’s binge-worthy chaos at its best.

Why the Mainstream “Hates” Kim Kardashian (and Why That’s About Jealousy)

Let’s be real: part of why All’s Fair is getting shredded is because of Kim Kardashian. She’s an easy target. Critics see her name and assume it’s a vanity project. But the truth? Kim’s success threatens the traditional Hollywood hierarchy.

She’s built a billion-dollar empire, conquered reality TV, fashion, business – and now, she’s producing and starring in her own show. That level of control and confidence makes people uncomfortable. The hate isn’t about the acting; it’s about the audacity.

And whether you love or hate her, you have to admit – Kim knows how to create a cultural moment. All’s Fair is one of them.

The Case for Giving It a Chance

If you tune in expecting The Good Wife, you’ll be disappointed. But if you press play for spectacle, power, fashion, and pure fun, you’ll have a blast.

• It’s empowering in its own, high-glam, chaotic way.
• It’s a reminder that not all entertainment has to be serious to be smart.
• And it’s a rare, women-led show that dares to be bold, beautiful, and a little bit ridiculous.

So, maybe All’s Fair isn’t “the worst show in the world.” Maybe it’s the most misunderstood.

Because beneath the glitter and drama is a show that celebrates women, reinvention, and the art of being extra.

The post Everyone Says Ryan Murphy and Kim Kardashian’s All’s Fair Is the Worst TV Show Ever: Here’s Why They’re Completely Wrong appeared first on KIMU.

The new trailer for The Kardashians Season 7 has left fans reeling – and reviving a years-old controversy between Kim Kardashian and Kanye West.

In a shocking first look at the upcoming Hulu season, a tearful Kim, 44, reveals that her life was in danger. “I got a call from investigators. Someone extremely close to me put a hit out on my life,” she says in the emotional clip, as cameras show her breaking down in tears while police cars arrive at her home. The revelation sent shockwaves across social media – with many immediately drawing connections to her ex-husband Kanye West.

Kanye’s Past Claim

Back in February 2022, during their bitter divorce battle, Kanye publicly claimed on Instagram that Kim had accused him of plotting to have her killed.

“YESTERDAY KIM ACCUSED ME OF PUTTING A HIT OUT ON HER,” West wrote in a since-deleted post. He went on to argue that such allegations could “actually get someone locked up.”

At the time, Kim did not confirm or deny West’s claim directly, but she did release a rare public statement criticizing his behavior, saying his “constant need for attacking me in interviews and on social media is actually more hurtful” than anything else.

The Timing of Kim’s Bombshell

Now, nearly four years later, Kim’s confession that someone “extremely close” to her hired a hitman has reignited speculation. While the Season 7 trailer does not name the individual, the fact that Kanye himself once publicly addressed the same accusation makes the overlap hard to ignore.

The footage shows Kim describing her terror: “I am terrified out of my mind.” She later admits she’s “happy it’s over,” suggesting that the threat was resolved – though how, and by whom, remains unclear.

Could It Have Been Kanye?

So far, there’s no evidence that Kanye was the person Kim was referring to. It’s worth noting that Kim has faced numerous stalkers and threats in recent years, including a 2024 incident where she filed for a restraining order against a man who tried to contact her at home.

Still, given Kanye’s own words in 2022 and the deeply fraught history between the former couple, fans are already speculating whether this season of The Kardashians will finally answer the lingering question: did Kim truly believe Kanye wanted her dead, or was the danger coming from somewhere else entirely?

Family on Edge

The trailer also shows the rest of the Kardashian-Jenner clan shaken by the ordeal. Kendall Jenner admits, “Everybody’s kind of on edge,” while Kylie recalls hearing footsteps in her own room, hinting that the family may have been dealing with multiple threats during filming.

What We Know Now

For now, neither Kim nor Kanye has commented on the new trailer. But Hulu promises that Season 7 – premiering October 23 – will shed more light on the terrifying situation.

Until then, the question remains: was Kim’s revelation connected to her infamous feud with Kanye, or is the truth something even darker?

The post Did Kanye West Put a Hit Out on Kim Kardashian? appeared first on KIMU.

FKA twigs’ latest music video for Childlike Things has ignited a cultural conversation that extends far beyond its dazzling visuals and avant-garde aesthetic. At the heart of the controversy is North West, the 11-year-old daughter of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West, whose cameo has sparked a storm of debate about artistic expression, childhood agency, and the relentless tug-of-war between celebrity co-parents.

The video, crafted by the boundary-pushing twigs and playwright Jeremy O. Harris, presents a meta-narrative about creative integrity versus industry demands. FKA twigs, playing an artist fighting to preserve her vision, faces off against a skeptical label executive played by Kevin Smith. North West’s unexpected appearance – rapping in Japanese – becomes the pivotal moment that sways the executive’s opinion, suggesting that the authenticity of the next generation may be the answer to the industry’s age-old struggles.

The Cultural Shockwave: Talent or Tokenism?

North’s inclusion in the video was immediately polarizing. Some hailed her linguistic feat as impressive, while others saw it as a gimmick engineered for viral impact. The fact that North, at such a young age, is already entrenched in high-profile artistic collaborations raises important ethical questions:

• Is this a case of a prodigious child being given opportunities to explore her artistry?
• Or is it an example of a young girl being absorbed into the celebrity machine before she can fully understand what she’s signing up for?

In an era where TikTok and Instagram have turned childhood into a monetized spectacle, North’s presence in Childlike Things is both a reflection of and a challenge to the norms of modern fame.

Kanye’s Fury: Protection or Possession?

Kanye West, never one to remain silent, reacted with characteristic outrage. Reports suggest he likened Kim Kardashian’s decision to allow North’s involvement to “sex trafficking,” accusing his ex-wife of “pimping out” their daughter for the sake of celebrity currency. This accusation, beyond its inflammatory rhetoric, speaks to a deeper tension within co-parenting dynamics in the age of social media and hyper-visibility.

Kanye’s stance appears to be one of protection, rooted in his longstanding discomfort with the exposure of his children. Yet, given his own history of incorporating North into his music and fashion ventures, his outrage raises another question:

• Is Kanye truly concerned about North’s well-being, or is this about control over her image – who gets to decide her trajectory, and whose artistic world she gets to inhabit?

Child Autonomy or Parental Projection?

The debate around North’s participation in Childlike Things is a microcosm of a much larger societal issue: the autonomy of children in the entertainment industry. Historically, child stars have struggled under the weight of expectations and exploitation. From Shirley Temple to Britney Spears, the intersection of youth and fame has been fraught with danger.

North West, born into unimaginable wealth and scrutiny, is in a uniquely complex position. Unlike the child stars of past generations, she isn’t just being groomed by studio executives – she is the product of a media empire built by her own family. The Kardashian brand thrives on visibility, and North’s artistic pursuits cannot be entirely separated from the machinery that made her mother a cultural force.

Yet, there’s also the possibility that North genuinely enjoys these creative endeavors. If she actively wants to be part of these projects, does that invalidate concerns about her being “pimped out”? Where do we draw the line between child empowerment and child exploitation?

The Future of North West: A Cautionary Tale or a New Era of Child Stardom?

The discourse surrounding Childlike Things ultimately transcends the specifics of North’s feature. It forces us to consider the evolving nature of fame, childhood, and parental influence in an age where every moment can be commodified.

If North is indeed an artistic prodigy, does she have the right to step into the spotlight on her own terms? Or is she simply another young celebrity being swept up in an industry that has historically chewed up and spit out child performers?

What’s clear is that the battle over North West – her image, her future, and her autonomy – will continue to unfold, not just between her parents but within the broader cultural conversation about what it means to grow up famous in the digital age.

The post North West, FKA twigs, and the Ethics of Child Stardom: A Battle of Art, Autonomy, and Parental Power appeared first on KIMU.

The Princess of Wales controversy has only gotten worse in the last week with swirling theories around her murder, lack of proof of life, photoshopped photos being sent out by the palace, the concept that William killed his pregnant wife, and her lover Thomas Kingston, and how the media are soft launching his new partner and potential future queen, Rose Hanbury.

For further context, AJ Willingham from CNN fills us on in the details.

The public absence of Catherine, Princess of Wales, has grown from a niche royal watcher concern to an international punchline in a matter of weeks. While Kensington Palace said her January abdominal surgery was planned and indicated she would be out of the public eye through March, several unusual details — grainy photos, an altered image, vague medical information, irregular updates from the British royal family — have kept the public guessing.

Droves of amateur detectives have crafted timelines and deep dives into the princess’ movements over the last few months, combining real concern with outlandish conspiracy. Regular people moonlighting as photo forensics specialists have suggested recent images of Kate are fabricated, spinning theories on where she actually is and who they think is trying to cover up the “truth.”

And yes, there are a lot of jokes. At first, it was just the typical guffaws that arise whenever something socially noteworthy gets passed around the online comedy circuit: Maybe Kate got a Brazilian butt lift! Maybe she got terrible bangs and is hiding away until they grow out! Maybe she’s getting in shape after a long MLB offseason!

Then, after a Mother’s Day photo of the princess and her three children was believed to have been altered — and subsequently pulled by news agencies — things started to get more serious and more unhinged. Typically complimentary British media outlets began to ask more pointed questions. American TV shows openly made fun of what was quickly becoming a royal mess, even trotting out theories that had previously been the exclusive fodder of gossip enthusiasts — more on that in a bit.

Oh, and Kate still hasn’t been seen in public since December.

The uproar, the theories, the analyses, the jokes and, yes, the serious concern — they all show the multitude of ways people interact with and view the royal family.

‘Everyone loves a mystery’

It’s not hard to understand why people are so invested in this particular piece of drama. After all, it’s called “palace intrigue” for a reason. Across social media and on message boards — and indeed, even before the internet, royal-watchers have gathered to discuss who’s doing what, who’s on the outs, and whose secrets are the juiciest.

“They lead these unattainable, unrelatable lives, and yet I’ve been aware of them my entire life,” said Susan Graves. The 40-year-old moved to the US nearly 20 years ago from Birmingham, UK, and keeps up with royal news on sites like Reddit, where the r/RoyalsGossip subreddit has more than 44,000 subscribers.

“I am old enough to remember when Princess Diana died, and all of the scandal and sadness that happened after that,” she told CNN. “And now, with everything happening with Prince Harry and his wife, and the seedier things happening with Prince Andrew, and the King being ill. It’s always something.”

Carly Wainsworth, a 28-year-old American who also follows royal gossip on Reddit and elsewhere, told CNN it all kind of feels like solving a mystery.

“It feels like fiction, but it’s not,” she said. “It’s just real enough to be real, if that makes sense. Then you throw in stuff like a Photoshopped picture, and you can’t help but be intrigued at what’s going on.”

She says even friends who usually don’t care about the royal family at all are invested in the drama with the princess.

“Everyone loves a mystery. A lot of these people think it’s fun to look for clues, to guess at what’s happening behind the scenes. It’s the same casual stuff people do when they gossip about people they actually know.”

Both Graves and Wainsworth said shows like “The Crown” and controversies surrounding various members of the royal family — from the media treatment of Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, and the fallout of Harry’s memoir “Spare,” to more serious subjects like allegations surrounding King Charles’ brother Prince Andrew and even enduring interest in the life and death of Princess Diana — have influenced the way people see the monarchy.

“I don’t know if it’s because I’m American or what, but I just assume they’re always hiding something,” Wainsworth said. “Not [the royal family] specifically, just anyone in that kind of position.”

It all sounds very serious, but a majority of Kate truthers are, to borrow from our British friends, just taking the piss.

The social media platform X now supports groups known as “communities,” and one called “where TF is Kate Middleton” has attracted 4,400 members ready to cram on their sleuthing hats.

“kate is missing and twitter is on the case! join us, indulge your guilty pleasure,” its description reads. “friends don’t let friends spiral down the royal rabbit hole alone.”

Oh, and what a royal rabbit hole it is: Videos and posts in the group outline stories that could trump any fictional mystery-thriller. On the other hand, there are also Photoshop jobs of Kate holding hands with perpetual celebrity boyfriend Pete Davidson and jokes that Kate may be taking a spin on the reality show “The Masked Singer.”

People don’t know what to believe

It’s one thing for at-home gossip lovers to dive into royal conspiracy theories, but as Catherine’s absence from the public eye wears on, entertainment and media outlets are getting more bold in their speculation. On a recent episode of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, host Stephen Colbert even openly entertained rumors about Kate and William’s personal lives.

In a single line, he also summed up how so many interested parties feel about the controversy: Concern for Kate as an individual, but a guilty hunger for more details.

“My heart goes out to Kate. Now let’s dish the hot goss!”

The Daily Show mocked the Mother’s Day photo controversy with a faux London correspondent reading out a list of things that “were also Kate’s fault,” including “colonization and the whole Prince Andrew thing.”

Even the Dublin Airport got a shot in, tweeting an ironic image of an obviously Photoshopped Cillian Murphy from their “social media intern Kate.”

More dire than the growing transatlantic comedy routine is the apparent dissolution of trust between some media outlets and the royal family. After Catherine apologized for the doctored Mother’s Day image, the global director of one of the world’s biggest news and photo agencies said Kensington Palace, which released the photo, was no longer considered a “trusted source.”

“Like with anything, when you’re let down by a source, the bar is raised and we’ve got major issues internally,” AFP head Phil Chetwynd told the BBC in a radio interview.

The British Press Photographers’ Association released a statement urging Kensington Palace “to make the original images available for inspection so that we can assess what has been done” and “make sure that it doesn’t happen again.”

Members of the British media are also beginning to openly question the official narrative of Kate’s absence. “Feeding frenzy over Kate proves the royals MUST be more transparent,” reads a recent headline from The Daily Mail, an outlet that is generally sympathetic in its royal news coverage.

The royal response hasn’t calmed things

Throughout the whole controversy, official information from Kensington Palace, which is the London residence and office of Prince William and Kate, has been uneven. Royal experts have noted that the palace typically doesn’t respond to rumors about the royal family, yet has made the rare move of responding to unconfirmed reports of Kate’s condition.

At the same time, the palace hasn’t responded to calls for an unedited version of the Mother’s Day photo, or provided more information on Kate’s whereabouts.

Mark Borkowski, a London-based public relations and crisis communications expert, told People that the royal family’s long-standing culture of silence is not doing them any favors when it comes to quelling conspiracies about Kate’s absence.

“The difficulty now is because there is so little information about what’s happening to Kate, if they were going to project things are all normal in this way — with a photo that is now deemed to be fake — it is pretty damning about the floundering and the poor decision making that’s going on,” Borkowski said.

While some voices have called for speculators to give Kate and the royal family some privacy, and others have suggested completely reasonable explanations for Kate’s disappearance, the fact remains: For one reason or another, people care about the royals. And, as national figureheads, it is part of their duty to be cared about.

“In a constitutional monarchy where kings and queens wield little actual, but plenty of soft power, visibility is everything,” Politico UK deputy editor Rosa Prince wrote for CNN. “They may not be able to pass laws, negotiate treaties or order troops into battle, but the British royals can open supermarkets, attend premieres and visit the sick. Without that, like Barbie, what were they made for?”

The post Even Kim Kardashian is on the hunt for a disappeared Kate Middleton appeared first on KIMU.

Nadia Lee Cohen also recently shot Lana Del Rey for the cover of Interview Magazine last March. The campaign itself is breathtaking, where we see Lana in her signature glamorous aesthetic, showcasing a beautiful and sexy collection.

In her post on Instagram, Kim excitedly captioned, “Our SKIMS Valentine LANA DEL REY. Music’s queen of hearts @honeymoon opens our dedicated Valentine’s Shop on Tuesday, January 23 at 9AM PT / 12PM ET.”

Lana comments, ““I’ve been a big fan of SKIMS since the beginning, so being featured in their Valentine’s campaign is so exciting.” She adds, “Their collection is so pretty and dreamy, which made collaborating with Nadia Lee Cohen on the creative so fun. I hope you love it as much as I do.”

After Lana Del Rey sung at one of Kim Kardashian’s weddings, we haven’t really seen much of the pair together, so this makes for a wonderful pop culture moment. We look forward to seeing the roll out of the campaign, and hope that Lana Del Rey appears in the next season of The Kardashians, where we can experience a more extensive behind the scenes look at how the campaign was engineered. In the meantime, we will enjoy the gallery herein and anticipate future music releases and Lana’s headline Coachella show this year!

The post Lana Del Rey for Kim Kardashian’s SKIMS Valentine’s Day Campaign appeared first on KIMU.

System magazine just announced the publication of an exclusive booklet presenting a portfolio of Juergen Teller’s photographs of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West, taken over the spring at Château d’Ambleville in France. The booklet, entitled Kanye, Juergen and Kim, will be on sale exclusively, and for a limited period, at IDEA BOOKS, Dover Street Market London and www.system-magazine.com from July 11th 2015.

The post Kim by Kanye and Juergen for System Magazine appeared first on KIMU.

Either way, The Mask(-ed woman) that we saw a preview for on the third issue of CR Fashion Book is none other than Kim Kardashian. I’ve only met Kim once (in Cape Town of all places) but the respect and admiration I have for her and what she has achieved in this world is unparalleled. She’s an extremely smart woman and this is proof in point of the fact that she is playing this game better than most.

The CR Fashion Book shoot took place at Karl Lagerfeld’s studio the night before the amfAR gala in Cannes. It is art-directed by Riccardo Tisci.

The alternative cover features a Bruce Weber shoot with Emily Ratajkowski (my Blurred Lines favourite) and two male models engaging in well, a three-way I suppose. It’s good, it’s very Weber.

The post CR Fashion Book’s Masked Cover Star Is…Kim Kardashian appeared first on KIMU.

The post kim kardashian by nick knight for v magazine appeared first on KIMU.